Forum:Department structure

As a recent rollback has stepped down, the question of another election to replace that user has come up. As Head of OOC, I don't believe the department needs another member as of this moment, as they would most likely have little to do. Furthermore, the previous bureaucrat administration made the decision to increase the number of rollbacks in total to four (now 6, with HR rollbacks), meaning two per department. Nevertheless, because the userbase is currently so small, it's my belief OOC should be limited to one rollback only. If we are struggling, we can always ask for help from HR, as helping out the other departments is one of their responsibilities. If it does pick up and OOC finds they do need another rollback, then an election can be held but the three members that currently comprise that team don't feel that they need another member. This isn't presenting an election to minimise all departments to three members, but rather a vote that would, in essence, give each bureaucrat the power to structure their department how they see best fit.

During a discussion with the admin team, it has been suggested that a member from s&s transfer from that department to OOC under the belief that the department might be overstaffed. Due to this suggestion, we're including it in the votes, thus giving three options.

Option one: we make the department number universal (keep it at four)

Option two: we allow each bureaucrat to decide how many members are allowed in their own department (keep OOC at the current number, three)

Option three: we move one member from s&s to ooc (make ooc four but have s&s be minimised to three)